type here...

The Geoengineering Evidence Challenge

The purpose of this challenge is to encourage the presentation of credible, verifiable evidence relating to claims that a current, undisclosed, large-scale atmospheric spraying or geoengineering program is operating.

The Proposition

Public discussion on this topic often relies on opinion, speculation, videos, photographs, social media posts, or anecdotal accounts. This challenge takes a different approach. Rather than debating beliefs, it asks a simple question:

Can the claim be demonstrated using evidence that can be independently verified?

A prize of AUD $10,000 will be awarded to the first entrant who successfully demonstrates the claim in accordance with the published competition rules and evidence requirements.

The challenge is open to anyone. You do not need to be a scientist or academic to participate. However, any evidence submitted must be capable of independent verification and must satisfy the published assessment criteria.

The competition is designed to be fair, transparent, and impartial. The outcome is not predetermined. If a participant provides evidence that meets the required standard, the prize will be awarded. If no submission meets that standard, no prize will be awarded.

What This Challenge Is About

This challenge is not intended to ridicule or dismiss anyone’s views, nor is it intended to promote any particular belief.

Its purpose is to encourage evidence-based discussion by providing a clear framework for evaluating claims. Participants are invited to present the strongest case they can, using reliable and verifiable evidence rather than speculation or opinion.

The competition will be judged solely on the quality and strength of the evidence submitted.

Evidence Matters

Not all information carries the same evidential weight.

Many claims circulating online rely on material that cannot be independently verified or reproduced. This challenge requires evidence that can be examined, authenticated, and evaluated objectively.

Detailed evidence requirements are published separately and explain exactly what forms of evidence are acceptable, what supporting documentation is required, and what types of material are insufficient on their own.

Independent Assessment

All submissions will be assessed against the published rules and evidence standards.

The assessment process is intended to be transparent and consistent. Every entrant will be judged using the same criteria, regardless of their personal views or conclusions.

Information about the judging process, adjudicators, and assessment methodology will be published before the competition opens.

The Prize

The successful entrant will receive AUD $10,000.

The full amount of the prize will be placed under the control of an independent third party. The prize money will remain reserved exclusively for this competition until it is either awarded to a successful entrant or the competition closes in accordance with the published rules.

The purpose of this arrangement is to ensure participants can enter with confidence, knowing that the prize funds have been set aside and will be available for payment immediately if a submission is judged to have met the published evidence standard.

Before You Enter

Before preparing a submission, participants should carefully read the Competition Rules, Evidence Requirements, and Frequently Asked Questions. These documents explain how submissions will be assessed and the standards that must be met before the prize can be awarded.

The objective is straightforward: if compelling, independently verifiable evidence exists, this challenge provides an opportunity to present it.

Continue to Rules

This site is not sponsored

The contributors are volunteers who share a goal of providing reliable evidence based information to promote informed decisions.

Featured

Counting the Cost of a Nationwide Chemtrail Programme

What would it actually take to run a nationwide US “chemtrail” operation? Our analysis reveals the staggering logistics — 165 aircraft, thousands of workers, and billions of dollars each year. The numbers tell their own story.

Why Contrails Can Linger and Spread

Contrails can linger and spread because they are essentially man-made cirrus clouds formed from ice crystals at high altitude. A cloud is made of water vapour, just like a contrail. Therefore if a cloud can linger, so can a contrail. When an aircraft’s hot exhaust mixes with cold, humid air, the resulting condensation freezes, creating thin white trails.

The Logistics of Secrecy: The Impossible Scale of a Chemtrail Programme

This article examines the chemtrail conspiracy through physics, engineering, and economics. It shows that a nationwide spraying programme would require hundreds of aircraft, thousands of staff, and billions in funding—leaving clear evidence. The science of contrails fully explains the phenomenon without invoking any secret aerosol operation.

The chemtrail conspiracy would collapse within a few years

Physicist David Grimes’s 2016 mathematical model shows that large conspiracies such as Chemtrails inevitably unravel through leaks. His analysis demonstrates that a secret global spraying programme involving thousands of people over decades is statistically implausible.

Cloud Seeding: You can’t Just Make Rain

It is impossible to manufacture rain, which depends on water vapour in the atmosphere. This is supplied by heat and evaporation from the Earth’s surface. Only when moist air cools and condenses into clouds is there potential for rain. Techniques such as cloud seeding cannot create this water; they can only encourage raindrops to form in clouds that are already primed to produce rain.

Cloud Seeding is Not Chemtrails

Cloud seeding and so-called “chemtrails” are fundamentally different, though often confused in conspiracy circles. Cloud seeding is a small-scale, scientifically documented technique in which aircraft introduce minute amounts of silver iodide into existing clouds to encourage rainfall; it does not involve spraying chemicals into clear skies, nor does it leave visible white streaks. Chemtrails.

Must Read

Why Humans Cannot Engineer Cyclones

Cyclones, hurricanes and typhoons are among the most powerful natural forces on Earth. Each one releases more energy in a few days than humanity consumes in years. Yet online theories claim that human technology, such as HAARP or directed electromagnetic fields (EMF), could somehow create or steer these vast systems.

Sun Dimming and SRM

Sun dimming, or solar radiation management (SRM), involves deliberately reducing incoming solar energy. A key method, stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), disperses reflective particles to raise Earth’s albedo, similar to cooling observed after volcanic eruptions. While models suggest this could lower global temperatures, risks include ozone depletion, altered rainfall patterns, and termination shock make it a highly uncertain intervention.

The Sky Looks Different Nowadays

Chemtrail believers often argue that certain cloud types are “new” formations created by secret weather manipulation, yet this claim overlooks the long history of cloud observation. Many of the patterns they point to have been described and classified by meteorologists for decades, with some recorded in cloud atlases from the 19th and early 20th centuries.

The Psychology Behind Geoengineering Conspiracy Theorists

Belief in conspiracies such as chemtrails and covert geoengineering programmes reveals more about the human psyche than about the atmosphere. We investigate individual motives, socio-cultural triggers, cognitive biases and online networks, offering a nuanced psychology-based explanation of why these theories persist.

Special & Accessory Clouds

Not all clouds fit neatly into the ten main genera. Some appear as distinctive features or as by-products of atmospheric processes. These forms provide visual evidence of atmospheric motion or turbulence and are important signals for weather observers and forecasters.

© chemtrails.info